ANALISA KOMPARATIF USAHATANI PADI ANTARA PENYIANGAN MANUAL DAN PENYIANGAN KIMIAWI (Studi Kasus Di Dsa Tanjung Kamal, Kecamatan Mangaran, Kabupaten Situbondo)

  • Lukman Hakim Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Abdurachman Saleh Situbondo
  • Andina Mayangsari Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Abdurachman Saleh Situbondo

Abstract

Research purpose is to determine whether there are differences in rice production between manual weeding and chemical weeding, to determine differences in income between manual weeding and chemical weeding, and to determine the efficiency difference between manual weeding and chemical weeding. Method of determining the area of research is purposive method. Respondent committed intentionally that taking 20 farmers weeding users manually using random sampling techniques (random), and 20 farmers using chemical weeding user survey. Respondent is intended that the same sample, with a total of 40 respondents farmers. Data analysis method used is the (t test) to test the first hypothesis there is a difference between the rice production using manually weeding and using chemical weeding. To test the second hypothesis using the (t test) there is a difference between the revenue using manually weeding and using chemical weeding. And the R/C ratio for the third hypothesis test there is a difference between the efficiency of using manually weeding and chemical weeding. The results showed there are differences in production, income and efficiency of rice significantly between using a manually weeding and using chemical weeding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Anonim, 2008. Geografis Situbondo (Online) Tersedia : (https://bptsitubondo.wordpress.com). 19 April 2015
2. , 2009. Kajian tekno ekonomi penyiangan secara manual (Online) Tersedia : (http://repository.unand.ac.id). 22 April 2015
3. , 2013. Budidaya tanaman padi sawah (Online) Tersedia : (http://Petunjukbudidaya.blogspot.com). 22 April 2015
4. , 2015a. Sejarah tanaman padi dan penyiangan (Online) Tersedia : (http://id.wikipedia.org). 22 April 2015
5. , 2015b. Residu dan efek samping herbisida (Online) Tersedia : (http://www.scribd.com). 09 September 2015
6. Azwar, S. 1997. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar : 146 Halaman
7. Hernanto, F. 1989. Ilmu usahatani. Jakarta : Penebar swadaya : 309 halaman
8. Noor, H.F. 2008.Ekonomi Manajerial. Jakarta. Penerbit PT RajaGrafindo Indonesia Persada : 546 Halaman
9. Jumin, H.B. 2002. Agronomi. Edisi ke 4. Jakarta. Penerbit PT RajaGrafindo Indonesia Persada : 216 Halaman
10. Kaman N, Indra M.H, dan Erdiman. 2014 Teknologi Melipat Gandakan Produksi Padi Nasional. Jakarta. Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama : 156 Halaman
11. Mubyarto, 1989. Ekonomi Pertanian. Jakarta. Penerbit LP3ES Anggota IKAPI : 305 Halaman
12. Nazir, M, 2005. Metode Penelitian. Cetakan ke 6. Jakarta. Penerbit Ghalia Persada Indonesia : 544 Halaman
13. Soekartawi, 1993. Prinsip dasar ekonomi pertanian. Jakarta. Penerbit PT RajaGrafindo Indonesia Persada : 234 Halaman
14. , 1995. Analisis Usahatani. Jakarta : Penerbit Universitas Indonesia : 110 Halaman
15. , 2000. Pengantar Agroindustri. Jakarta : Penerbit PT RajaGrafindo Indonesia Persada : 152 Halaman
16. Sugiyono, 1997. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung. Penerbit CV alfabeta : 306 Halaman
17. Subagyo,P dan Djarwanto,PS. 2005. Statistika Induktif. Edisi ke 5. Yogyakarta. Penerbit BPFE-Anggota IKAPI : 326 Halaman
18. Y.T.Prasetiyo,2002.Budidaya Padi Sawah Tanpa Olah Lahan. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Kanisius : 59 Halaman
Published
2015-11-26
How to Cite
HAKIM, Lukman; MAYANGSARI, Andina. ANALISA KOMPARATIF USAHATANI PADI ANTARA PENYIANGAN MANUAL DAN PENYIANGAN KIMIAWI (Studi Kasus Di Dsa Tanjung Kamal, Kecamatan Mangaran, Kabupaten Situbondo). AGRIBIOS, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 68-91, nov. 2015. ISSN 2723-7044. Available at: <https://unars.ac.id/ojs/index.php/agribios/article/view/312>. Date accessed: 26 nov. 2024.
Section
Articles