The Representation of Fatherhood Identity on Netflix Cinema
Abstract
This study aims to investigate how a man constructs his masculinity stereotype as a father and caregiver as represented in the original Netflix’s Fatherhood. This research is qualitative with Stuart Hall's Perspectives of Representation as an approach. This perspective is to find the meaning of American fatherhood as represented in the film and to explore how the meaning of fatherhood significantly affects the global meaning of transnational communication in media. Qualitative means that a film as well as text is read from its language, image, and other aspects such as color, lighting, composition, articulation details, and role positions are taken consideration in finding meaning. The results of the study show that the fatherhood concept symbolizes ideal masculinity, anti-thesis of traditional masculinity, develops hybrid masculinity, rejects femininity as well as hegemonic masculinity, and pro-gender equality. In conclusion, the fatherhood concept inspires non-America films such as Indonesian and Indian films. This research proves that a film is made not only for economic aspects or a visual product that is intended to entertain the audience, but a film is a text that can be read, evaluated, and analyzed in depth through various approaches since a film represents a reality.
Downloads
References
Bainbridge, C., & Yates, C. (2005). Cinematic Symptoms of Masculinity in Transition: Memory, History, and Mythology in Contemporary Film. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 10, 299–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.pcs.2100054
Butters Jr, G. (2014). Masculinity in Film: The Emergence of a New Literature (February 2014): Home. Choice, 51(6).
Carleton, C. W. (2021). Women in World Cinema: Stories of Struggle and Resistance. https://teachers.yale.edu/curriculum/viewer/initiative_06.01.04_u
Carrigan, T., Connell, B., & Lee, J. (1985). Toward a New Sociology of Masculinity. Theory and Society, 14(5), 551–604. http://www.jstor.org/stable/657315
Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd Editio). University of California Press.
Crane, D. (2014). Cultural globalization and the dominance of the American film industry: cultural policies, national film industries, and transnational film. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 20(4), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2013.832233
Dermott, E. (2008). Intimate Fatherhood: A Sociological Analysis. Routledge.
Doucet, A. (2013). A “Choreography of Becoming”: Fathering, Embodied Care, and New Materialisms. Canadian Review of Sociology, 50(3), 284–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12016
Gallagher, S. (2004). The Interpersonal and Emotional Beginnings of Understanding: A Review of Peter Hobson’s The Cradle of Thought: Exploring the Origins of Thinking. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 11(3), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2004.0064
Giannini, M., & Minervini, D. (2017). A Relational Approach for the Understanding of the Hegemonic Masculinities. Insights from Pierre Bourdieu, Georg Simmel and Marianne Weber. About Gender: International Journal of Gender Studies, 6, 1–28. https://doi.org/67(6869:&;;:<=878:&>?;76:(9(66(@7A
Greven, D. (2009). Manhood in Hollywood from Bush to Bush. University of Texas Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7560/719873
Hall, S. (2006). The medium is the messagerie. In M. G. Durham & D. M. Kellner (Eds.), Media and Cultural Studies (Revised Ed, pp. 163–173). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1525/REP.2019.145.1.107
Heise, L., Greene, M. E., Opper, N., Stavropoulou, M., Harper, C., Nascimento, M., Zewdie, D., & Gender Equality, Norms, and H. S. C. (2019). Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health. The Lancet, 393, 2440–2454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30652-x
Lenz, G. H., Kroes, R., Kunow, R., Hornung, A., & Boelhower, W. (2011). Redefinitions of citizenship and revisions of cosmopolitanism-transnational perspectives. Journal of Transnational American Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/t831007017
Mara, L. C. (2014). Alternative Masculinities for a Changing World. In A. Carabi & J. M. Armengol (Eds.), Masculinities & Social Change (Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 211–212). https://doi.org/10.17583/msc.2015.1583
McDonald, T. H. (2018). Mediated Masculinities: The Forms of Masculinity in American Genre Film, 1990-1999. Brock University.
Miller, T. (2011). Falling back into Gender? Men’s Narratives and Practices around First-time Fatherhood. Sociology, 45(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0038038511419180
Prino, L. E., Rollè, L., Sechi, C., Patteri, L., Ambrosoli, A., Caldarera, A. M., Gerino, E., & Brustia, P. (2016). Parental relationship with twins from pregnancy to 3 months: The relation among parenting stress, infant temperament, and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(October), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01628
Rowe, J. C. (Ed. . (2010). A Concise Companion to American Studies (Blackwell Companions in Cultural Studies) (1st ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Ruspini, E., & Crespi, I. (2016). Balancing Work and Family in a Changing Society: The Fathers’ Perspective (1st ed.). Palgrave MAcmillan.
Simonton, D. K. (2004). The “Best Actress” Paradox: Outstanding Feature Films Versus Exceptional Women’s Performances. Sex Roles, 50, 781–794. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000029097.98802.2c
Thompson, E. H., & Bennett, K. M. (2015). Measurement of masculinity ideologies: A (critical) review. Psychology of Men & Masculinit, 16(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0038609
Vlahovicova, K., Rakshit, D., & F, F. A. (2022). Masculinidades , Relaciones de Género e Identidades Indígenas en Tres Pueblos (Issue March). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19634.68801
An author who publishes in Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).