PEMILIHAN SUPPLIER APEL BERBASIS GREEN PROCUREMENT DENGAN METODE AHP (Studi Kasus: Toko Malang Strudel)
Abstract
Industrial development and consumer concern for the environment are increasing as well as the issue of environmentally sound industrial concepts. Thus forcing the industry to make adjustments to the green industry concept in each of its businesses, including procurement, which is better known as green procurement. The purpose of this study was to select apple suppliers for strudel shops in Malang using decision making, in order to find suppliers who can increase the company's competitiveness by determining the criteria and sub criteria weights based on the concept of green procurement. This research was conducted at the cake shop Strudel Malang to evaluate and select suppliers of apples based on green procurement using the AHP method. There are six criteria used, namely quality, technological capability, pollution control, environmental management, green products, and green competence. Each criterion has sub-criteria between 3 or 4 sub-criteria. The number of sub-criteria is used to determine the RI value. The RI value is used to calculate the CR value for each criterion. The results of data processing show that the highest CR value is in the technological capability criteria and the lowest CR value is in environmental management.
Downloads
References
Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S.S. and Goyal, S.K. 2010. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers”,International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 126, pp. 370-378.
Chen, Yuh-Jen. 2010. Structural methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain. Information Sciences.
Cheng, S., Chan, C.W., and Huang, G.H., 2000. Using multiple criteria decision analysis for supporting decision of solid waste management. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A 37 (6), 975–990.
Cousins, P., Lamming, R., Lawson, B., Squire, B., 2008. Strategic Supply Management: Principles, Theories and Practice. Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Harlow.
De Boer, L., Van der Wegen, L.L.M., 2003. Practice and promise of formal supplier selection: a study of four empirical cases. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 9, 109e118.
Ghoddsypour, SH., dan O’Brien. 2001. The Total Cost of Logistic in Supplier Selection, under Conditions of Multiple Sourching, Multiple Criteria and Capacity Constrains. Internasional Journal of Production Economics. 73: 15-27.
Igarashi, M., Luitzen, Db., Michelsen, O. 2015. Investigating the anatomy of supplier selection in green public procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production. (108): 442-450.
Klassen, R.D. and Vachon, 2013. Collaboration and evaluation in the supply chain: The impact on plant-level environmental investment, Production and Operations Management, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 336-353.
Lee, S. and Klassen, R.D. 2008. Drivers and enablers that foster environmental management capabilities in small and medium-sized suppliers in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 573-586.
Lion, Ching-Nung dan Kao, Hsing-Peo. 2010. Supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, analytical hierarchy process and multi choice goal programming. Computers and Industrial Engineering (58): 571-577.
Messah, Y. A. Utomo S, dan Angelica S. C. Ballo. 2016. Kajian Penerapan Green procurement pada Proyek Infrastruktur Jalan di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. jurnal Teknik sipil. Vol. V No.2.
Omkarprasad, S.V. and Kumar, S. 2006. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of application. EJOR, 169:1-29.
Ozkan, Betul Husein Bashgil and Nergis, Sahim. 2011. Supplier selection using analytical hierarchy process: an application from Turkey. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol 2.
Ross, A.D. and Jayaraman, V. 2009. Strategic purchases of bundled products in a health care supply chain environment. Decision Sciences, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 269-293.
Rusinko, C.A. 2007. Green manufacturing: An evaluation of environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices and their impact on competitive outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 445-454.
Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D.Alfabeta, Bandung.
Sureeyatanapas, P., Sriwattananusart, K., Niyamosoth, T., Sessomboon, W., Sirawadee, A. 2018. Supplier selection towards uncertain and unavailable information: An extension of TOPSIS method. Journal Operations Research Perspective (5): 69-79.
Wilson, D.C., Parker, D., Cox, J., Strange, K., Willis, P., Blakey, N., dan Raw, L. 2012. Business waste prevention: A review of the evidence. Waste Management & Research. 30 (9): 17-28.
Yeh, Wei-Chang, and Chuang, Mei-Chi. 2010. Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems. Expert Systems with Applications (38): 4244-4253.
Yusuf, R.D. and Poh Yee, K. 2001. A preliminarystudy on the potential use of the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) to predict advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) implementation. Roboticsand Computer Integrated Manufacturing.17:421-427.
Zhang, G. 2012. An Integrated Model for Closed Loop Supply Chain Configuration and Supplier Selection: Multi Objective Approach. Expert system application. (39). 6782-6791.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
